“Without relationships, we are either dead to the
world – or dead”
RICHARD KOCH
There are relationships and there are
relationships. And I’m not saying about the ones we had with family (we didn’t
choose them) or the ones with friends (we love to think that we chose ours even
though events and circumstances are to be blamed). I’m talking about romantic
relationships with the opposite sex, of course. Subsequently, the question pops
up: are our romantic relationships (supposed to be) ordained or pre-destined.
Like any other non-rhetorical question that starts
with ‘are’, the answering options are limited to offensive or defensive,
positive or negative, yes or no (except maybe the infamous ‘are you asleep?’). Also
like any one of those silly questions that change the course of history, there
are always two schools of thought, usually and most naturally, opposite. Let’s
call ours the YES and NO schools of thought.
The YES school of thought is mainly composed of
moralists and many are found in the church. Don’t get it tangled – being
moralist doesn’t mean one is a Christian or vice-versa. The yesies, singular
yesy, believe that an infinite being, in this case God, created a woman for
every man (meaning our polygamous brothers should be charged for theft). An
example, as always, is taken from the bible. The first woman, Eve, was made
from one of the ribs of Adam, the first man. Interestingly, the yesies believe
women were not created, they were made. This debunks the argument of the
various ‘what-ifs’. What if the woman is not forthcoming or basically does not
like her ordained man? What if by some unfortunate situation, the man dies as a
young boy before they meet? Or is already married when they do meet? God in his
unusual mercy, the yesies believe, would make another woman for the man or
create another man for the woman. There are more spiritual connotations to all
these than physical – the man and women do not have to be birthed; destinies
change and a chain reaction ensues.
The nolites from the NO school of thought believe
otherwise. They are definitely not disputing the a-woman-for-a-man ideology as
some, to a degree, are moralists and church goers. Their main argument is that
Adam was created a man, so a woman would have been his helper not a girl. Woman
was made for man, not girl for boy. The nolites claim the yesies are too
concerned about marriage and they tend to forget every other romantic
relationship the man or woman were involved in before they got together. A
remarkable insight is that if one’s first romantic relationship culminates in
marriage, one tends to be eternally grateful to the spouse which can have
unhealthy consequences. Marriage cannot occur unless the boy becomes the man
and the girl, a woman (except for those on a craze to enter the Guinness book
of records by marrying their babies or even unconceptualised foetus). A girl
must be emotionally matured to marry and some of the maturity has to come with
coping with various past and present relationships, be it family, friends, or
boyfriends.
If my opinion is of any interest to you, here it
is: I’m a nolite to the bone. The problem is, when you support anything to the
bone, you tend to forget the skin, muscle and blood of the matter. Bones don’t
make us humans - they make us skeletons. I understand that we nolites want to
have fun before we settle down for marriage but I also understand that the
yesies are coming from the standpoint that God is the author and finisher of
our destinies, the beginning and the end. But that’s the point. The beginning
(he created us and ordained us to our families) and the end (heaven or hell) is
all that is beyond us. We have a choice to which end we go to depending on our
action and reactions. Similarly, the end (or beginning) of your marital bliss
is one that is sanctioned by God, but you still have a choice decorated with
consequences.
This is not a
gather-your-arms-and-shoot-your-son-become-he-is-a-nolite war; rather it is
more like an intellectual war, an educative war that needs more lights illuminating
the numerous dark alleys.
I’m of hope that a compromise between the yesies
and the nolites is obtainable (a closer look and there are some signs) if
disciples and egos don’t get in the way.
No comments:
Post a Comment